Postponing (again) the rules regarding the ban on internal combustion engine vehicles is nonsense, according to Marc Muller, founder of the company IMPACT LIVING.
An electric car is much simpler to produce than an internal combustion one. There is no – apart from battery chemistry and the nonsense you read in the media – major innovation in an electric car. Same electric motor, same battery management system, same charger, and moreover the same globalized designers. A Chinese or a European one, it’s the same car with the same architecture.
Competition is therefore played on volumes and production efficiency. Whoever produces quickly and in large quantities wins. Some Chinese manufacturers already have assembly lines automated to 95%. That is to say, roughly without humans, but above all with low variable costs. Once the factory is built, producing more costs very little.
Meanwhile, China registers nearly 1'000'000 electric vehicles per month versus 150'000 in Europe. With these volumes, this allows the Chinese to make margins on electric vehicles, to reinvest in production innovation and to further lower prices.
The time window during which the European consumer agrees to pay more for a worse product on the pretext that it is made in Europe is shrinking at a supersonic speed.
If measures are not urgently put in place to limit consumers' ability to buy internal combustion vehicles, the European industry will fragment and will end up being a mere importer of Chinese products, rebranded Polestar, Peugeot or Dacia… with no jobs to show for it. It’s written in advance; the rest is short-term lobbying.
This article has been automatically translated using AI. If you notice any errors, please don't hesitate to contact us.
"For SMEs and micro-enterprises, which make up a large majority of the Swiss economic fabric, the transition is no longer a mere environmental option, but a strategic necessity to ensure our prosperity," says Christophe Barman, national co-president of the FSE.
"If we want to succeed in the energy transition, we must also accept financing it. That requires clear and reliable rules capable of guaranteeing sufficient incentives for investment," explains Michael Frank, director of AES.
Responding to a recent survey conducted by Comparis on Swiss real estate, Sascha Nick, a researcher at EPFL's Laboratory of Environmental and Urban Economics, says that "Switzerland is not suffering from a housing shortage."
"Launched for reasons that are more electoral than ecological, the call for a climate fund that would absorb between 5 and 10 billion francs each year appears unnecessary, absurd, costly, centralizing and poorly conceived," says Pierre-Gabriel Bieri, policy manager at the Centre Patronal.